Should writers review books?

18/10/2011 by David Maybury · No Comments

It's been one of those perennial questions - both before and after taking up reins at Inis. There have been countless panels in Ireland, the UK, the US and further afield that talk in circles but have yet to deliver anything that resembles a quantifiable answer - should writers review each other?

Personally, I believe that yes, they should, that it is part of a duty to literary engagement that every writer become involved. The continuing growth of Children's Books Ireland has been thanks to the time and generosity of those involved in children's books, including authors - and inside that umbrella, Inis has been able to grow with thanks to the dedicated readership who offer their time, dedication and passion to contribute and read.

One of my first changes after joining the magazine was to add as many more reviewers to list as possible - initially focusing on writers and illustrators. I was surprised, baffled and occasionally annoyed at authors who were reluctant to review books using the phrase, "oh, I don't do that." While I have become more sympathetic to those who decline a request to review - I've been at the receiving end of enough angry emails to understand why anyone would wish to avoid it - I still do have that niggling thought at the end of every day: Why don't you?

Chris Cleave tackled the question in last weeks Guardian - is it good to keep peer reviews in the critical mix? Is there a useful distinction to be made between a peer appreciation and a critical review?

I have plenty to say (when do I not?) but I'd like to know where you stand. Should writers be reviewing each other?